LangChain OpenWiki validates repo documentation for coding agents. But repo orientation is not the same as evidence-graded product understanding.
Your vibe-coded app caught on and now people pay for it — but you can't fully explain it. Build a mental model without reading every line, top-down.
Your product works. On launch day someone asks what it does at the edges — and you'd have to open the file to answer. That gap is the real launch risk.
Vibe-coding got you a working product you can't speak for. Reclaiming it isn't slowing down — it's re-authoring what you shipped, behavior by behavior.
You own a product you can't explain — acquired, inherited, or vibe-coded with AI. Here's how to read code you didn't really write, behavior by behavior.
You vibe-coded a working product. Users use it. You can't speak for it without reading every line. The product is yours — you just don't know it yet.
AI makes rebuilding cheap. But product decisions are expensive to recreate from memory. Here's how a behavior spec makes 'start fresh' a feature, not a failure.
Shipping fast with AI coding tools is genuinely good. The problem isn't the speed — it's what gets left behind. Product reasoning doesn't survive the vibe.
